New version of uTorrent bundled with secret bitcoin mining ...

r/torrents - Torrenting Discussion and News

But you wouldn't download a new Director of Talent
[link]

Utorrent Bids to Become a Tron Super Representative | [blokt] - Blockchain, Bitcoin & Cryptocurrency News

Utorrent Bids to Become a Tron Super Representative | [blokt] - Blockchain, Bitcoin & Cryptocurrency News submitted by cryptopiabull to blokt [link] [comments]

If you need help or you're New to roms and emulation these are some tips

First thing first You need an Emulator i suggest RetroArch is a Newbie Friendly good all in one emulator this is a video to how to setup and use ReTrOaRcH
OpenEmu FOR MAC USERS THAT WILL NOT USE RETRO ARCH BECAUSE IT'S NOT ENOUGH LOOKING LIKE MAC UI OR THEY HAVE AN OCD OR something like that it's good anyways ( i didn't use it bc i'm not a mac user )
🕿︎♋︎◻︎◻︎●︎♏︎ ◻︎❒︎□︎♎︎◆︎♍︎⧫︎⬧︎ ♋︎❒︎♏︎ □︎❖︎♏︎❒︎◻︎❒︎♓︎♍︎♏︎♎︎✆︎
and a download Manger
Jdownloader ( download the jar version ) A photo to explain what to download (don't download the .exe version it has an adware in it )
or idm u can trial reset with this
a torrent clients (credits to Piracy wiki)
for mobile ( torrent clients ) [credits to Piracy wiki]
stay away from [credits to Piracy wiki]
second you need sources to download roms these are the best sites + some tips
sites :
ziperto
No intro romset ( you can download it directly without a torrent you CAN FROM HERE ) (If you don't want to download the whole romset for the system press view content )
AlvRo's Collection
Vimm's Lair
The Eye
GamesTorrents ( of course if u can torrent )
MEGA-ROM
N(itro)blog
THE MEGATHREAD
RomsUniverse
MOBAsuite
IDK?? A WIKI FOR ROMpacks?????
The Old Megathread idk why u need it
A guy who uploaded some roms but he didn't get attention
ROMstorge ( idk how to use this site )
Roms WIKI
Another ROMs site
Edgeemu
EmulatorGames ( the name is baaaaaaaad )
ROMsDownload
WoW Roms
cdROMance
Startgame ( wtf is this name )
Retrostic
ROMulation
If u Want to Check if the site is safe go to here and comment ur site url
Tips :
Tip #1 : If you're in a country that hate piracy like USA or Germany ( i think Germany have dmca or something ?? idk ) etc. stay away from torrent and stay away from http sites
( download Https Everywhere extension and enable encrypt all sites eligible option by pressing on the icon of https everywhere ) even if your browser included with it . because it will warn you if the site is http...
Tip #2 : FBI will not raid your house ( because fbi will not waste there time on you )
Tip #3 : https is your best friend because it's encrypted that means if you go to a https roms site
your isp will see (random numbers and letters) .com/.net/.org/.to/.site etc.
Tip #4 : install an adblock i suggest Ublock Origin
Tip #5 : install a pop-up blocker if you have a chromium based browser like Brave, Chrome, New Edge etc. i suggest this ( if you know a better one please give me the link ) poperblocker
Tip #6 The MegaThread is your OTHER BEST FRIEND if you want an rom head to the megathread and press ctrl + F and search ;)
Tip #7 DON'T DO NOT OPEN ANY ANY ANY .MSI .EXE/.DMG/.DEB or ANY OTHER FILE THAT you CAN OPEN WITHOUT AN EMULATOR THE FILE IT'S 2000% A VIRUS ( EXCEPT WHEN you DOWNLOAD RETRO ARCH [ or any other emulator OF COURSE ] ) AND DON'T OPEN .BAT FILES IT CAN DELETE SYSTEM32 FILE AND IT'S ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT FILES IN WINDOWS
Tip #8 Emulating is Legal but Downloading ROMs is ILEGAL ( OF COURSE IF you're LIVING IN A COUNTRY THAT DMCA IS A HOLY THING ) ;-)
Tip #9 If you're suspicious of a file u can scan it on VirusTotal or Hybird Analysis ( you need to upload the file because it will open it on a vm in there sever ).
Tip #10 I recommend using a controller if you have a xbox controller just connect it to your pc and you're good to go BUT if you have a dualshock controller (ps controller )
use DS4 Windows ( if you have a windows pc ) ( I Know it's the fork bc the og creator stopped working on it in 2016 or somthing like that )
or any other controller .
Tip #11 If you download a rom and it came in .rar .zip .7z .r001( if the rom came with multiple files like .r001 .r002 .r003... you need to extract just a one file) etc. you can use 7-ZIP or Winrar ( don't worry 40 days trial doesn't end ).

Tip #12 if the rom came in this order rom.rar.exe don't think to open it and if you hide the extension file from showing from the file name it will show like rom.rar but it's actually a .exe or .dmg etc.

Tip #13 if you have a linux pc or a mac that doesn't mean you will not get infected even Temple OS have malwares ( if you don't what's a malware is just search )​.
Tip #14 if u tired of link shorters and etc. use universal Bypass
Tip #15 Some good emulators :
Dolphin a wii and gamecube emulator ( check the compatibility list to check if the game work )
Citra 3DS emulator ( check the compatibility list to check if the game work )
BSNES HD beta if u want to play snes games on HD
PCSX2 the best ps2 emulator
EPSXE a little bit old but it's good (ps1)
DON'T use zsnes ( i guy on the comments said that )
RPCS3 PS3 ( check the compatibility list to check if the game work )
Xenia Xbox 360 ( check the compatibility list to check if the game work )
Cemu WiiU Emulator ( check the compatibility list to check if the game work )
a Decryptor for 3ds games if citra won't open the rom HERE
DS DeSmuME (OLD) ( if u have a good ds emulator give me the link pls )
Project64 N64
DOSBox DOS emulator ( check the compatibility list to check if the game work )
IF U HAVE any other emulator pls link it in the comments <3
Tip #16
Romsmania
CoolRoms
etc. are NOT SAFE
if you have any other tips share it =)
submitted by real_nyha454 to Roms [link] [comments]

News: uTorrent Installs Bitcoin Miners On Your PC And Is Not Safe. | G.T.N.

News: uTorrent Installs Bitcoin Miners On Your PC And Is Not Safe. | G.T.N. submitted by Craiggaming to gamingnews [link] [comments]

Intents Festival, The Online Festival | Livesets Download

Intents Festival, The Online Festival | Livesets Download Single sets can be downloaded via a torrent client. The source of the rip for 'Intents Festival, The Online Festival' is a copy of their Twitch Livestream, recorded using streamlink. Except of Devin Wild's set, that one is ripped from YouTube, since I realized too late that they were streaming on Twitch. Twitch has higher video quality than YouTube. Screen or audio records are never used.
Edit: All the 3 stages, Friday Pre-Party, Saturday Outdoor Mainstage and Indoor Stage are all in 1 spreadsheet with multiple tabs. But here are the links directly to the correct tab: Friday Pre-Party Saturday Outdoor Mainstage Saturday Indoor Stage
If you use BitTorrent or μTorrent, shame on you. Get a good torrent client like qBittorrent or Deluge, they dont include advertisements and work as well, if not better.
New! a less than 1 minute tutorial on how to download a liveset if do you do not have qBittorrent yet! Use the pause button if it goes too fast ;) To copy a link from the spreadsheet use 'CTRL+C' or any other equivalent for your OS. You can also add all the livesets at once Example
Note: If you have issues with the download not strarting, you can add my seedbox as a peer manually: 185.45.195.189:20117 Quick tutorial on how to do thisClick me
submitted by DyonR to hardstyle [link] [comments]

Intents Festival, The Online Festival v2.0 | Livesets Download (With Saturday!)

Intents Festival, The Online Festival v2.0 | Livesets Download Single sets can be downloaded via a torrent client. The source of the rip for 'Intents Festival, The Online Festival' is a copy of their Twitch Livestream, recorded using streamlink. I never use screen or audio records.
All the 3 stages, Friday Pre-Party, Saturday Outdoor Mainstage and Indoor Stage are all in 1 spreadsheet with multiple tabs. But here are the links directly to the correct tab: Friday Pre-Party Saturday Outdoor Mainstage Saturday Indoor Stage
If you use BitTorrent or μTorrent, shame on you. Get a good torrent client like qBittorrent or Deluge, they dont include advertisements and work as well, if not better.
New! a less than 1 minute tutorial on how to download a liveset if do you do not have qBittorrent yet! Use the pause button if it goes too fast ;) To copy a link from the spreadsheet use 'CTRL+C' or any other equivalent for your OS. You can also add all the livesets at once Example
Note: If you have issues with the download not strarting, you can add my seedbox as a peer manually: 185.45.195.189:20117 Quick tutorial on how to do thisClick me
Note 2: Downloading sets from the Indoor Stage are currently slow as fuck because they are still getting uploaded to a server.
submitted by DyonR to hardstyle [link] [comments]

WiSH Outdoor & Into The Summer Festival | Livesets Download

The release of these livesets isn't as exiciting as Defqon.1 of course, but I figured why not release them in case someone missed them.
WiSH Outdoor & Into The Summer Festival | Livesets Download With DJs like: Jay Reeve, Sound Rush, Primeshock, ANDY SVGE, Ran-D, B-Front and RVAGE RVAGE played two new tracks, B-Front played his upcoming IDs and a B-Frontliner track even.
Single sets can be downloaded via a torrent client. The source of the rip for 'WiSH Outdoor' is their Twitch Stream. The source of the rip for 'Into The Summer Festival' is their Vimeo video, which is still online, but the player of Vimeo is mediocre. The audio quality of Into The Summer Festival also sucks, but nothing I can do about that unfortunately. I never use screen or audio recordings.
Here is the link to the sheet with the magnet links: WiSH Outdoor & Into The Summer Festival
If you use BitTorrent or μTorrent, shame on you. Get a good torrent client like qBittorrent or Deluge, they dont include advertisements and work as well, if not better.
How to download with qBittorrent a less than 1 minute tutorial on how to download a liveset if do you do not have qBittorrent yet! Use the pause button if it goes too fast ;) To copy a link from the spreadsheet use 'CTRL+C' or any other equivalent for your OS. You can also add all the livesets at once Example
Note: If you have issues with the download not strarting, you can add my seedbox as a peer manually: 185.45.195.189:20117 Quick tutorial on how to do thisClick me
Note 2: If someone, for some reason, wants one of these EDM artist sets, let me know and I will add them.
submitted by DyonR to hardstyle [link] [comments]

Can someone explain how many different types of "proof of work" can exist? Context inside, topic more complicated than title implies.

Hi guys, We all know SHA-256 (BTC, BCH, BSV), Scrypt (LTC, Dash, NRG, if my memory serves correctly), cryptonote / RandomX (monero), and Ethash / SHA-3 for Ethereum. I am not a software engineer but I have purchased an antminer before.
I would like to go in to something a little bit different now with regards to "minting" new coins. This hypothetical would copy Bitcoin's "minting" or proof of work for simplicty's sake, but through a different software interface. Anyone can edit 24 lines of code from the Ethereum source code, then create their own coin and put 99.99999% of it in to an escrow that slowly redistributes the token over years of time, but nobody really likes that.
Let's say I make "Azureuscoin" (Azureus is a P2P file-sharing program like utorrent or bittorrent). There will never be more than 21 million Azureuscoin. Then I run Azureus for six days without anyone else downloading and running Azureus. 6 x 24 = 144 (hours), 144 x 6 (blocks every hour mined) = 864 blocks mined x 50 (amount of Azureuscoin minted per block / ten minutes) = 43,200. Then other P2P filesharing fans start to join in on using Azureus.
My question is, what mechanism of "proof of work" would make the above paragraph possible? I imagine this would require an oracle of some sort? Or would a blockchain need to be built on top of Azureus?
submitted by sgtslaughterTV to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

qBittorent not seeding

hey,
i switched from utorrent to qbittorent since utorrent is basically malware and a bitcoin miner and i get great download speeds but can't seed ever since.
tried changing the settings in the client but that didn't help.
i got my port open so everything is supposed to work fine. i downloaded a torrent with a lot of peers so i can seed and still it doesn't help.
could my DNS server has anything to do with it ? i'm using 1.1.1.1 by cloudfare ( https://1.1.1.1/ ).
i'm running out of ideas, and i really dont wanna go back to uttorent and start dealing with malware again.
any new ideas to try ?
submitted by lidorc to qBittorrent [link] [comments]

Question for people who recommend qBittorrent 2.2.1 over newer builds

I've always heard that there can be security issues with older torrent client builds. Is this true and something I should be worried about? I prefer 2.2.1 over 3.3.3 but I want to know if there any serious downsides.
submitted by internetsuperstar to torrents [link] [comments]

I need help choosing a seedbox for beginners.

I am completely new to seedboxes and I have no idea which to choose.
I will be using it for torrenting (utorrent Mac)
What is your budget per month? £10 - £15
How much disk space do you need? 1TB
Are you looking for shared or dedicated seedbox? Unsure.
Particular uses, streaming? VPN? One-click ease? Racing? Torrenting
What is the primary reason for getting a seedbox? DMCA? Ratio? Wife discovered Porn? DMCA and Ratio
Location (yours and/or the vendors)? United Kingdom, Europe
Particular speed (100M, 1G, 10G, Ludicrous Speed, etc)? At least 1G
Do you use public trackers extensively? Yes
How much experience do you have with seedboxes, linux, and alike? Need a lot of handholding? I have zero experience in seedbox.
Is your location problematic? No
Particular payment methods the vendor needs to accept: bitcoin, paypal, paysafecard, Turkish Lire? Preferably PayPal
Particular content: Games, TV shows, Anime; Movies; Remuxes; the oeuvre of Fatty Arbuckle? Films, tv, music, 4K movies
Using problemsome trackers like public ones or challenging trackers like RED and CHD? Not really.
Any idea on how much bandwidth you need a month? 1TB; 3TB; 30TB? 1Tb
Are you a paranoiac, need special safety assurances? No. Just good support is a bonus.
Other more unique requirements? You want to run a website too; Azureus is your favorite client, can't live without it; Or god forbid you really, really need Windows. I use MAC exclusively and my torrent client is utorrent.
Thank you very very much in advance.
Edit: brainfreeze.
submitted by mrsergeisbeard to seedboxes [link] [comments]

[#114|+411|110] If you're a PC user and have had utorrent installed, you may be subject to a drop in frame rates across all your games. A month ago, their software package was found to deceptively install a bitcoin miner that uses your graphics card in the background. [/r/gaming]

submitted by FrontpageWatch to longtail [link] [comments]

Sr.System Admin Mining Bitcoin

I'm a system admin of four months. Just really starting to get settled with a new company. I come to work this morning and notice that the Sr.System Admin is logged in on my machine. No biggie, I can't think of any reason why he needed to be on my computer, but he was. I noticed my resolution had changed pretty significantly. No biggie. I made some changes to my settings and the resolution didn't change. Odd I thought, so I took a look at my GPU drivers. Ah, they were updated on a day when I was offsite. I then look at the list of programs that were installed on my computer...A new catalyst update...ok UTorrent...Wut? Easy Miner... HE WAS MINING BITCOIN ON MY COMPUTER!? I told my boss and he simply talked to me in a hushed voice and told me that I piqued his curiosity when I was talking about it the other day... My mind was blown. This is a red flag in so many ways. I'm a new system admin and I'm completely shocked right now. I'm considering my next course of action. Help me here reddit.
UPDATE***
So I spoke with the HR representative and asked for company policy handbook or documentation. She said they didn't have any and that I should ask my boss, as there was nothing in writing. I also noticed that my antivirus was completely turned off and has been since Monday. It sucks because this is my first sysadmin job. However, this can't be tolerated. I believe I will start looking for another job:(
submitted by Calahad to sysadmin [link] [comments]

Is anyone else freaked out by this whole blocksize debate? Does anyone else find themself often agreeing with *both* sides - depending on whichever argument you happen to be reading at the moment? And do we need some better algorithms and data structures?

Why do both sides of the debate seem “right” to me?
I know, I know, a healthy debate is healthy and all - and maybe I'm just not used to the tumult and jostling which would be inevitable in a real live open major debate about something as vital as Bitcoin.
And I really do agree with the starry-eyed idealists who say Bitcoin is vital. Imperfect as it may be, it certainly does seem to represent the first real chance we've had in the past few hundred years to try to steer our civilization and our planet away from the dead-ends and disasters which our government-issued debt-based currencies keep dragging us into.
But this particular debate, about the blocksize, doesn't seem to be getting resolved at all.
Pretty much every time I read one of the long-form major arguments contributed by Bitcoin "thinkers" who I've come to respect over the past few years, this weird thing happens: I usually end up finding myself nodding my head and agreeing with whatever particular piece I'm reading!
But that should be impossible - because a lot of these people vehemently disagree!
So how can both sides sound so convincing to me, simply depending on whichever piece I currently happen to be reading?
Does anyone else feel this way? Or am I just a gullible idiot?
Just Do It?
When you first look at it or hear about it, increasing the size seems almost like a no-brainer: The "big-block" supporters say just increase the blocksize to 20 MB or 8 MB, or do some kind of scheduled or calculated regular increment which tries to take into account the capabilities of the infrastructure and the needs of the users. We do have the bandwidth and the memory to at least increase the blocksize now, they say - and we're probably gonna continue to have more bandwidth and memory in order to be able to keep increasing the blocksize for another couple decades - pretty much like everything else computer-based we've seen over the years (some of this stuff is called by names such as "Moore's Law").
On the other hand, whenever the "small-block" supporters warn about the utter catastrophe that a failed hard-fork would mean, I get totally freaked by their possible doomsday scenarios, which seem totally plausible and terrifying - so I end up feeling that the only way I'd want to go with a hard-fork would be if there was some pre-agreed "triggering" mechanism where the fork itself would only actually "switch on" and take effect provided that some "supermajority" of the network (of who? the miners? the full nodes?) had signaled (presumably via some kind of totally reliable p2p trustless software-based voting system?) that they do indeed "pre-agree" to actually adopt the pre-scheduled fork (and thereby avoid any possibility whatsoever of the precious blockchain somehow tragically splitting into two and pretty much killing this cryptocurrency off in its infancy).
So in this "conservative" scenario, I'm talking about wanting at least 95% pre-adoption agreement - not the mere 75% which I recall some proposals call for, which seems like it could easily lead to a 75/25 blockchain split.
But this time, with this long drawn-out blocksize debate, the core devs, and several other important voices who have become prominent opinion shapers over the past few years, can't seem to come to any real agreement on this.
Weird split among the devs
As far as I can see, there's this weird split: Gavin and Mike seem to be the only people among the devs who really want a major blocksize increase - and all the other devs seem to be vehemently against them.
But then on the other hand, the users seem to be overwhelmingly in favor of a major increase.
And there are meta-questions about governance, about about why this didn't come out as a BIP, and what the availability of Bitcoin XT means.
And today or yesterday there was this really cool big-blockian exponential graph based on doubling the blocksize every two years for twenty years, reminding us of the pure mathematical fact that 210 is indeed about 1000 - but not really addressing any of the game-theoretic points raised by the small-blockians. So a lot of the users seem to like it, but when so few devs say anything positive about it, I worry: is this just yet more exponential chart porn?
On the one hand, Gavin's and Mike's blocksize increase proposal initially seemed like a no-brainer to me.
And on the other hand, all the other devs seem to be against them. Which is weird - not what I'd initially expected at all (but maybe I'm just a fool who's seduced by exponential chart porn?).
Look, I don't mean to be rude to any of the core devs, and I don't want to come off like someone wearing a tinfoil hat - but it has to cross people's minds that the powers that be (the Fed and the other central banks and the governments that use their debt-issued money to run this world into a ditch) could very well be much more scared shitless than they're letting on. If we assume that the powers that be are using their usual playbook and tactics, then it could be worth looking at the book "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" by John Perkins, to get an idea of how they might try to attack Bitcoin. So, what I'm saying is, they do have a track record of sending in "experts" to try to derail projects and keep everyone enslaved to the Creature from Jekyll Island. I'm just saying. So, without getting ad hominem - let's just make sure that our ideas can really stand scrutiny on their own - as Nick Szabo says, we need to make sure there is "more computer science, less noise" in this debate.
When Gavin Andresen first came out with the 20 MB thing - I sat back and tried to imagine if I could download 20 MB in 10 minutes (which seems to be one of the basic mathematical and technological constraints here - right?)
I figured, "Yeah, I could download that" - even with my crappy internet connection.
And I guess the telecoms might be nice enough to continue to double our bandwidth every two years for the next couple decades – if we ask them politely?
On the other hand - I think we should be careful about entrusting the financial freedom of the world into the greedy hands of the telecoms companies - given all their shady shenanigans over the past few years in many countries. After decades of the MPAA and the FBI trying to chip away at BitTorrent, lately PirateBay has been hard to access. I would say it's quite likely that certain persons at institutions like JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs and the Fed might be very, very motivated to see Bitcoin fail - so we shouldn't be too sure about scaling plans which depend on the willingness of companies Verizon and AT&T to double our bandwith every two years.
Maybe the real important hardware buildout challenge for a company like 21 (and its allies such as Qualcomm) to take on now would not be "a miner in every toaster" but rather "Google Fiber Download and Upload Speeds in every Country, including China".
I think I've read all the major stuff on the blocksize debate from Gavin Andresen, Mike Hearn, Greg Maxwell, Peter Todd, Adam Back, and Jeff Garzick and several other major contributors - and, oddly enough, all their arguments seem reasonable - heck even Luke-Jr seems reasonable to me on the blocksize debate, and I always thought he was a whackjob overly influenced by superstition and numerology - and now today I'm reading the article by Bram Cohen - the inventor of BitTorrent - and I find myself agreeing with him too!
I say to myself: What's going on with me? How can I possibly agree with all of these guys, if they all have such vehemently opposing viewpoints?
I mean, think back to the glory days of a couple of years ago, when all we were hearing was how this amazing unprecedented grassroots innovation called Bitcoin was going to benefit everyone from all walks of life, all around the world:
...basically the entire human race transacting everything into the blockchain.
(Although let me say that I think that people's focus on ideas like driverless cabs creating realtime fare markets based on supply and demand seems to be setting our sights a bit low as far as Bitcoin's abilities to correct the financial world's capital-misallocation problems which seem to have been made possible by infinite debt-based fiat. I would have hoped that a Bitcoin-based economy would solve much more noble, much more urgent capital-allocation problems than driverless taxicabs creating fare markets or refrigerators ordering milk on the internet of things. I was thinking more along the lines that Bitcoin would finally strangle dead-end debt-based deadly-toxic energy industries like fossil fuels and let profitable clean energy industries like Thorium LFTRs take over - but that's another topic. :=)
Paradoxes in the blocksize debate
Let me summarize the major paradoxes I see here:
(1) Regarding the people (the majority of the core devs) who are against a blocksize increase: Well, the small-blocks arguments do seem kinda weird, and certainly not very "populist", in the sense that: When on earth have end-users ever heard of a computer technology whose capacity didn't grow pretty much exponentially year-on-year? All the cool new technology we've had - from hard drives to RAM to bandwidth - started out pathetically tiny and grew to unimaginably huge over the past few decades - and all our software has in turn gotten massively powerful and big and complex (sometimes bloated) to take advantage of the enormous new capacity available.
But now suddenly, for the first time in the history of technology, we seem to have a majority of the devs, on a major p2p project - saying: "Let's not scale the system up. It could be dangerous. It might break the whole system (if the hard-fork fails)."
I don't know, maybe I'm missing something here, maybe someone else could enlighten me, but I don't think I've ever seen this sort of thing happen in the last few decades of the history of technology - devs arguing against scaling up p2p technology to take advantage of expected growth in infrastructure capacity.
(2) But... on the other hand... the dire warnings of the small-blockians about what could happen if a hard-fork were to fail - wow, they do seem really dire! And these guys are pretty much all heavyweight, experienced programmers and/or game theorists and/or p2p open-source project managers.
I must say, that nearly all of the long-form arguments I've read - as well as many, many of the shorter comments I've read from many users in the threads, whose names I at least have come to more-or-less recognize over the past few months and years on reddit and bitcointalk - have been amazingly impressive in their ability to analyze all aspects of the lifecycle and management of open-source software projects, bringing up lots of serious points which I could never have come up with, and which seem to come from long experience with programming and project management - as well as dealing with economics and human nature (eg, greed - the game-theory stuff).
So a lot of really smart and experienced people with major expertise in various areas ranging from programming to management to game theory to politics to economics have been making some serious, mature, compelling arguments.
But, as I've been saying, the only problem to me is: in many of these cases, these arguments are vehemently in opposition to each other! So I find myself agreeing with pretty much all of them, one by one - which means the end result is just a giant contradiction.
I mean, today we have Bram Cohen, the inventor of BitTorrent, arguing (quite cogently and convincingly to me), that it would be dangerous to increase the blocksize. And this seems to be a guy who would know a few things about scaling out a massive global p2p network - since the protocol which he invented, BitTorrent, is now apparently responsible for like a third of the traffic on the internet (and this despite the long-term concerted efforts of major evil players such as the MPAA and the FBI to shut the whole thing down).
Was the BitTorrent analogy too "glib"?
By the way - I would like to go on a slight tangent here and say that one of the main reasons why I felt so "comfortable" jumping on the Bitcoin train back a few years ago, when I first heard about it and got into it, was the whole rough analogy I saw with BitTorrent.
I remembered the perhaps paradoxical fact that when a torrent is more popular (eg, a major movie release that just came out last week), then it actually becomes faster to download. More people want it, so more people have a few pieces of it, so more people are able to get it from each other. A kind of self-correcting economic feedback loop, where more demand directly leads to more supply.
(BitTorrent manages to pull this off by essentially adding a certain structure to the file being shared, so that it's not simply like an append-only list of 1 MB blocks, but rather more like an random-access or indexed array of 1 MB chunks. Say you're downloading a film which is 700 MB. As soon as your "client" program has downloaded a single 1-MB chunk - say chunk #99 - your "client" program instantly turns into a "server" program as well - offering that chunk #99 to other clients. From my simplistic understanding, I believe the Bitcoin protocol does something similar, to provide a p2p architecture. Hence my - perhaps naïve - assumption that Bitcoin already had the right algorithms / architecture / data structure to scale.)
The efficiency of the BitTorrent network seemed to jive with that "network law" (Metcalfe's Law?) about fax machines. This law states that the more fax machines there are, the more valuable the network of fax machines becomes. Or the value of the network grows on the order of the square of the number of nodes.
This is in contrast with other technology like cars, where the more you have, the worse things get. The more cars there are, the more traffic jams you have, so things start going downhill. I guess this is because highway space is limited - after all, we can't pave over the entire countryside, and we never did get those flying cars we were promised, as David Graeber laments in a recent essay in The Baffler magazine :-)
And regarding the "stress test" supposedly happening right now in the middle of this ongoing blocksize debate, I don't know what worries me more: the fact that it apparently is taking only $5,000 to do a simple kind of DoS on the blockchain - or the fact that there are a few rumors swirling around saying that the unknown company doing the stress test shares the same physical mailing address with a "scam" company?
Or maybe we should just be worried that so much of this debate is happening on a handful of forums which are controlled by some guy named theymos who's already engaged in some pretty "contentious" or "controversial" behavior like blowing a million dollars on writing forum software (I guess he never heard that reddit.com software is open-source)?
So I worry that the great promise of "decentralization" might be more fragile than we originally thought.
Scaling
Anyways, back to Metcalfe's Law: with virtual stuff, like torrents and fax machines, the more the merrier. The more people downloading a given movie, the faster it arrives - and the more people own fax machines, the more valuable the overall fax network.
So I kindof (naïvely?) assumed that Bitcoin, being "virtual" and p2p, would somehow scale up the same magical way BitTorrrent did. I just figured that more people using it would somehow automatically make it stronger and faster.
But now a lot of devs have started talking in terms of the old "scarcity" paradigm, talking about blockspace being a "scarce resource" and talking about "fee markets" - which seems kinda scary, and antithetical to much of the earlier rhetoric we heard about Bitcoin (the stuff about supporting our favorite creators with micropayments, and the stuff about Africans using SMS to send around payments).
Look, when some asshole is in line in front of you at the cash register and he's holding up the line so they can run his credit card to buy a bag of Cheeto's, we tend to get pissed off at the guy - clogging up our expensive global electronic payment infrastructure to make a two-dollar purchase. And that's on a fairly efficient centralized system - and presumably after a year or so, VISA and the guy's bank can delete or compress the transaction in their SQL databases.
Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but if some guy buys a coffee on the blockchain, or if somebody pays an online artist $1.99 for their work - then that transaction, a few bytes or so, has to live on the blockchain forever?
Or is there some "pruning" thing that gets rid of it after a while?
And this could lead to another question: Viewed from the perspective of double-entry bookkeeping, is the blockchain "world-wide ledger" more like the "balance sheet" part of accounting, i.e. a snapshot showing current assets and liabilities? Or is it more like the "cash flow" part of accounting, i.e. a journal showing historical revenues and expenses?
When I think of thousands of machines around the globe having to lug around multiple identical copies of a multi-gigabyte file containing some asshole's coffee purchase forever and ever... I feel like I'm ideologically drifting in one direction (where I'd end up also being against really cool stuff like online micropayments and Africans banking via SMS)... so I don't want to go there.
But on the other hand, when really experienced and battle-tested veterans with major experience in the world of open-souce programming and project management (the "small-blockians") warn of the catastrophic consequences of a possible failed hard-fork, I get freaked out and I wonder if Bitcoin really was destined to be a settlement layer for big transactions.
Could the original programmer(s) possibly weigh in?
And I don't mean to appeal to authority - but heck, where the hell is Satoshi Nakamoto in all this? I do understand that he/she/they would want to maintain absolute anonymity - but on the other hand, I assume SN wants Bitcoin to succeed (both for the future of humanity - or at least for all the bitcoins SN allegedly holds :-) - and I understand there is a way that SN can cryptographically sign a message - and I understand that as the original developer of Bitcoin, SN had some very specific opinions about the blocksize... So I'm kinda wondering of Satoshi could weigh in from time to time. Just to help out a bit. I'm not saying "Show us a sign" like a deity or something - but damn it sure would be fascinating and possibly very helpful if Satoshi gave us his/hetheir 2 satoshis worth at this really confusing juncture.
Are we using our capacity wisely?
I'm not a programming or game-theory whiz, I'm just a casual user who has tried to keep up with technology over the years.
It just seems weird to me that here we have this massive supercomputer (500 times more powerful than the all the supercomputers in the world combined) doing fairly straightforward "embarassingly parallel" number-crunching operations to secure a p2p world-wide ledger called the blockchain to keep track of a measly 2.1 quadrillion tokens spread out among a few billion addresses - and a couple of years ago you had people like Rick Falkvinge saying the blockchain would someday be supporting multi-million-dollar letters of credit for international trade and you had people like Andreas Antonopoulos saying the blockchain would someday allow billions of "unbanked" people to send remittances around the village or around the world dirt-cheap - and now suddenly in June 2015 we're talking about blockspace as a "scarce resource" and talking about "fee markets" and partially centralized, corporate-sponsored "Level 2" vaporware like Lightning Network and some mysterious company is "stess testing" or "DoS-ing" the system by throwing away a measly $5,000 and suddenly it sounds like the whole system could eventually head right back into PayPal and Western Union territory again, in terms of expensive fees.
When I got into Bitcoin, I really was heavily influenced by vague analogies with BitTorrent: I figured everyone would just have tiny little like utorrent-type program running on their machine (ie, Bitcoin-QT or Armory or Mycelium etc.).
I figured that just like anyone can host a their own blog or webserver, anyone would be able to host their own bank.
Yeah, Google and and Mozilla and Twitter and Facebook and WhatsApp did come along and build stuff on top of TCP/IP, so I did expect a bunch of companies to build layers on top of the Bitcoin protocol as well. But I still figured the basic unit of bitcoin client software powering the overall system would be small and personal and affordable and p2p - like a bittorrent client - or at the most, like a cheap server hosting a blog or email server.
And I figured there would be a way at the software level, at the architecture level, at the algorithmic level, at the data structure level - to let the thing scale - if not infinitely, at least fairly massively and gracefully - the same way the BitTorrent network has.
Of course, I do also understand that with BitTorrent, you're sharing a read-only object (eg, a movie) - whereas with Bitcoin, you're achieving distributed trustless consensus and appending it to a write-only (or append-only) database.
So I do understand that the problem which BitTorrent solves is much simpler than the problem which Bitcoin sets out to solve.
But still, it seems that there's got to be a way to make this thing scale. It's p2p and it's got 500 times more computing power than all the supercomputers in the world combined - and so many brilliant and motivated and inspired people want this thing to succeed! And Bitcoin could be our civilization's last chance to steer away from the oncoming debt-based ditch of disaster we seem to be driving into!
It just seems that Bitcoin has got to be able to scale somehow - and all these smart people working together should be able to come up with a solution which pretty much everyone can agree - in advance - will work.
Right? Right?
A (probably irrelevant) tangent on algorithms and architecture and data structures
I'll finally weigh with my personal perspective - although I might be biased due to my background (which is more on the theoretical side of computer science).
My own modest - or perhaps radical - suggestion would be to ask whether we're really looking at all the best possible algorithms and architectures and data structures out there.
From this perspective, I sometimes worry that the overwhelming majority of the great minds working on the programming and game-theory stuff might come from a rather specific, shall we say "von Neumann" or "procedural" or "imperative" school of programming (ie, C and Python and Java programmers).
It seems strange to me that such a cutting-edge and important computer project would have so little participation from the great minds at the other end of the spectrum of programming paradigms - namely, the "functional" and "declarative" and "algebraic" (and co-algebraic!) worlds.
For example, I was struck in particular by statements I've seen here and there (which seemed rather hubristic or lackadaisical to me - for something as important as Bitcoin), that the specification of Bitcoin and the blockchain doesn't really exist in any form other than the reference implementation(s) (in procedural languages such as C or Python?).
Curry-Howard anyone?
I mean, many computer scientists are aware of the Curry-Howard isomorophism, which basically says that the relationship between a theorem and its proof is equivalent to the relationship between a specification and its implementation. In other words, there is a long tradition in mathematics (and in computer programming) of:
And it's not exactly "turtles all the way down" either: a specification is generally simple and compact enough that a good programmer can usually simply visually inspect it to determine if it is indeed "correct" - something which is very difficult, if not impossible, to do with a program written in a procedural, implementation-oriented language such as C or Python or Java.
So I worry that we've got this tradition, from the open-source github C/Java programming tradition, of never actually writing our "specification", and only writing the "implementation". In mission-critical military-grade programming projects (which often use languages like Ada or Maude) this is simply not allowed. It would seem that a project as mission-critical as Bitcoin - which could literally be crucial for humanity's continued survival - should also use this kind of military-grade software development approach.
And I'm not saying rewrite the implementations in these kind of theoretical languages. But it might be helpful if the C/Python/Java programmers in the Bitcoin imperative programming world could build some bridges to the Maude/Haskell/ML programmers of the functional and algebraic programming worlds to see if any kind of useful cross-pollination might take place - between specifications and implementations.
For example, the JavaFAN formal analyzer for multi-threaded Java programs (developed using tools based on the Maude language) was applied to the Remote Agent AI program aboard NASA's Deep Space 1 shuttle, written in Java - and it took only a few minutes using formal mathematical reasoning to detect a potential deadlock which would have occurred years later during the space mission when the damn spacecraft was already way out around Pluto.
And "the Maude-NRL (Naval Research Laboratory) Protocol Analyzer (Maude-NPA) is a tool used to provide security proofs of cryptographic protocols and to search for protocol flaws and cryptosystem attacks."
These are open-source formal reasoning tools developed by DARPA and used by NASA and the US Navy to ensure that program implementations satisfy their specifications. It would be great if some of the people involved in these kinds of projects could contribute to help ensure the security and scalability of Bitcoin.
But there is a wide abyss between the kinds of programmers who use languages like Maude and the kinds of programmers who use languages like C/Python/Java - and it can be really hard to get the two worlds to meet. There is a bit of rapprochement between these language communities in languages which might be considered as being somewhere in the middle, such as Haskell and ML. I just worry that Bitcoin might be turning into being an exclusively C/Python/Java project (with the algorithms and practitioners traditionally of that community), when it could be more advantageous if it also had some people from the functional and algebraic-specification and program-verification community involved as well. The thing is, though: the theoretical practitioners are big on "semantics" - I've heard them say stuff like "Yes but a C / C++ program has no easily identifiable semantics". So to get them involved, you really have to first be able to talk about what your program does (specification) - before proceeding to describe how it does it (implementation). And writing high-level specifications is typically very hard using the syntax and semantics of languages like C and Java and Python - whereas specs are fairly easy to write in Maude - and not only that, they're executable, and you state and verify properties about them - which provides for the kind of debate Nick Szabo was advocating ("more computer science, less noise").
Imagine if we had an executable algebraic specification of Bitcoin in Maude, where we could formally reason about and verify certain crucial game-theoretical properties - rather than merely hand-waving and arguing and deploying and praying.
And so in the theoretical programming community you've got major research on various logics such as Girard's Linear Logic (which is resource-conscious) and Bruni and Montanari's Tile Logic (which enables "pasting" bigger systems together from smaller ones in space and time), and executable algebraic specification languages such as Meseguer's Maude (which would be perfect for game theory modeling, with its functional modules for specifying the deterministic parts of systems and its system modules for specifiying non-deterministic parts of systems, and its parameterized skeletons for sketching out the typical architectures of mobile systems, and its formal reasoning and verification tools and libraries which have been specifically applied to testing and breaking - and fixing - cryptographic protocols).
And somewhat closer to the practical hands-on world, you've got stuff like Google's MapReduce and lots of Big Data database languages developed by Google as well. And yet here we are with a mempool growing dangerously big for RAM on a single machine, and a 20-GB append-only list as our database - and not much debate on practical results from Google's Big Data databases.
(And by the way: maybe I'm totally ignorant for asking this, but I'll ask anyways: why the hell does the mempool have to stay in RAM? Couldn't it work just as well if it were stored temporarily on the hard drive?)
And you've got CalvinDB out of Yale which apparently provides an ACID layer on top of a massively distributed database.
Look, I'm just an armchair follower cheering on these projects. I can barely manage to write a query in SQL, or read through a C or Python or Java program. But I would argue two points here: (1) these languages may be too low-level and "non-formal" for writing and modeling and formally reasoning about and proving properties of mission-critical specifications - and (2) there seem to be some Big Data tools already deployed by institutions such as Google and Yale which support global petabyte-size databases on commodity boxes with nice properties such as near-real-time and ACID - and I sometimes worry that the "core devs" might be failing to review the literature (and reach out to fellow programmers) out there to see if there might be some formal program-verification and practical Big Data tools out there which could be applied to coming up with rock-solid, 100% consensus proposals to handle an issue such as blocksize scaling, which seems to have become much more intractable than many people might have expected.
I mean, the protocol solved the hard stuff: the elliptical-curve stuff and the Byzantine General stuff. How the heck can we be falling down on the comparatively "easier" stuff - like scaling the blocksize?
It just seems like defeatism to say "Well, the blockchain is already 20-30 GB and it's gonna be 20-30 TB ten years from now - and we need 10 Mbs bandwidth now and 10,000 Mbs bandwidth 20 years from - assuming the evil Verizon and AT&T actually give us that - so let's just become a settlement platform and give up on buying coffee or banking the unbanked or doing micropayments, and let's push all that stuff into some corporate-controlled vaporware without even a whitepaper yet."
So you've got Peter Todd doing some possibly brilliant theorizing and extrapolating on the idea of "treechains" - there is a Let's Talk Bitcoin podcast from about a year ago where he sketches the rough outlines of this idea out in a very inspiring, high-level way - although the specifics have yet to be hammered out. And we've got Blockstream also doing some hopeful hand-waving about the Lightning Network.
Things like Peter Todd's treechains - which may be similar to the spark in some devs' eyes called Lightning Network - are examples of the kind of algorithm or architecture which might manage to harness the massive computing power of miners and nodes in such a way that certain kinds of massive and graceful scaling become possible.
It just seems like a kindof tiny dev community working on this stuff.
Being a C or Python or Java programmer should not be a pre-req to being able to help contribute to the specification (and formal reasoning and program verification) for Bitcoin and the blockchain.
XML and UML are crap modeling and specification languages, and C and Java and Python are even worse (as specification languages - although as implementation languages, they are of course fine).
But there are serious modeling and specification languages out there, and they could be very helpful at times like this - where what we're dealing with is questions of modeling and specification (ie, "needs and requirements").
One just doesn't often see the practical, hands-on world of open-source github implementation-level programmers and the academic, theoretical world of specification-level programmers meeting very often. I wish there were some way to get these two worlds to collaborate on Bitcoin.
Maybe a good first step to reach out to the theoretical people would be to provide a modular executable algebraic specification of the Bitcoin protocol in a recognized, military/NASA-grade specification language such as Maude - because that's something the theoretical community can actually wrap their heads around, whereas it's very hard to get them to pay attention to something written only as a C / Python / Java implementation (without an accompanying specification in a formal language).
They can't check whether the program does what it's supposed to do - if you don't provide a formal mathematical definition of what the program is supposed to do.
Specification : Implementation :: Theorem : Proof
You have to remember: the theoretical community is very aware of the Curry-Howard isomorphism. Just like it would be hard to get a mathematician's attention by merely showing them a proof without telling also telling them what theorem the proof is proving - by the same token, it's hard to get the attention of a theoretical computer scientist by merely showing them an implementation without showing them the specification that it implements.
Bitcoin is currently confronted with a mathematical or "computer science" problem: how to secure the network while getting high enough transactional throughput, while staying within the limited RAM, bandwidth and hard drive space limitations of current and future infrastructure.
The problem only becomes a political and economic problem if we give up on trying to solve it as a mathematical and "theoretical computer science" problem.
There should be a plethora of whitepapers out now proposing algorithmic solutions to these scaling issues. Remember, all we have to do is apply the Byzantine General consensus-reaching procedure to a worldwide database which shuffles 2.1 quadrillion tokens among a few billion addresses. The 21 company has emphatically pointed out that racing to compute a hash to add a block is an "embarrassingly parallel" problem - very easy to decompose among cheap, fault-prone, commodity boxes, and recompose into an overall solution - along the lines of Google's highly successful MapReduce.
I guess what I'm really saying is (and I don't mean to be rude here), is that C and Python and Java programmers might not be the best qualified people to develop and formally prove the correctness of (note I do not say: "test", I say "formally prove the correctness of") these kinds of algorithms.
I really believe in the importance of getting the algorithms and architectures right - look at Google Search itself, it uses some pretty brilliant algorithms and architectures (eg, MapReduce, Paxos) which enable it to achieve amazing performance - on pretty crappy commodity hardware. And look at BitTorrent, which is truly p2p, where more demand leads to more supply.
So, in this vein, I will close this lengthy rant with an oddly specific link - which may or may not be able to make some interesting contributions to finding suitable algorithms, architectures and data structures which might help Bitcoin scale massively. I have no idea if this link could be helpful - but given the near-total lack of people from the Haskell and ML and functional worlds in these Bitcoin specification debates, I thought I'd be remiss if I didn't throw this out - just in case there might be something here which could help us channel the massive computing power of the Bitcoin network in such a way as to enable us simply sidestep this kind of desperate debate where both sides seem right because the other side seems wrong.
https://personal.cis.strath.ac.uk/neil.ghani/papers/ghani-calco07
The above paper is about "higher dimensional trees". It uses a bit of category theory (not a whole lot) and a bit of Haskell (again not a lot - just a simple data structure called a Rose tree, which has a wikipedia page) to develop a very expressive and efficient data structure which generalizes from lists to trees to higher dimensions.
I have no idea if this kind of data structure could be applicable to the current scaling mess we apparently are getting bogged down in - I don't have the game-theory skills to figure it out.
I just thought that since the blockchain is like a list, and since there are some tree-like structures which have been grafted on for efficiency (eg Merkle trees) and since many of the futuristic scaling proposals seem to also involve generalizing from list-like structures (eg, the blockchain) to tree-like structures (eg, side-chains and tree-chains)... well, who knows, there might be some nugget of algorithmic or architectural or data-structure inspiration there.
So... TL;DR:
(1) I'm freaked out that this blocksize debate has splintered the community so badly and dragged on so long, with no resolution in sight, and both sides seeming so right (because the other side seems so wrong).
(2) I think Bitcoin could gain immensely by using high-level formal, algebraic and co-algebraic program specification and verification languages (such as Maude including Maude-NPA, Mobile Maude parameterized skeletons, etc.) to specify (and possibly also, to some degree, verify) what Bitcoin does - before translating to low-level implementation languages such as C and Python and Java saying how Bitcoin does it. This would help to communicate and reason about programs with much more mathematical certitude - and possibly obviate the need for many political and economic tradeoffs which currently seem dismally inevitable - and possibly widen the collaboration on this project.
(3) I wonder if there are some Big Data approaches out there (eg, along the lines of Google's MapReduce and BigTable, or Yale's CalvinDB), which could be implemented to allow Bitcoin to scale massively and painlessly - and to satisfy all stakeholders, ranging from millionaires to micropayments, coffee drinkers to the great "unbanked".
submitted by BeYourOwnBank to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

uTorrent/EpicScale story appears to be fabricated

Here's the evidence:
How much evidence is there that this story is true and not either user error or a malicious fabrication? I haven't been able to find any.
submitted by karl_w_w to technology [link] [comments]

Upfiring should consider adding back the team information on the website (if they do not intend to create a search/Catalog function)

If team doesn't intend to create a search function for the content, there should be no copyright issues. It is completely legal to create a peer-to-peer client for file sharing (similar to deluge, transmission, utorrent, etc). The incentives are in the form of cryptocurrency and not fiat. So, what the reasons for keeping the team anonymous?
We already know the CEO of the project. However new investors are wary of the lack of team information. Since there is likely no legal issue, Upfiring should consider adding back the team information on the website.
EDIT: If catalog has to be added, there are two options - decentralized and centralized. Decentralizing it would require each client to keep a database of the whole catalog (similar to how we keep the whole bitcoin database). If I'm running the client, I'd definitely not want to host the whole database of who knows what kind of files. And centralizing it would require the team to manage the content, cater to copyright notices, etc. Neither option seems good. Better option in my opinion would be if individual people create their own catalog websites.
submitted by ricktam to Upfiring [link] [comments]

some questions about bitmessage.

Hey, i'm a real noobie but really interested in trying all sorts of private communication tools like PGP, Signal, TOX.
Of course stuff like Signal requires a Play Store and your Phone number but trying to bring awareness to my friends and family about how to securely communicate isn't that easy, so i figure installing Signal on their phone and get to chat with me that way is a good start at least.
So usability is a big bonus in todays competitive world. Sure, filling a nieche and trying out new stuff is awesome and necessary.
I'm also really into Bitcoin for quite a while and appreciate its cryptographic nature a lot and is also the reason i found out about Bitmessage a few years ago.
So i have used it before and if i remember correctly i was able to send a message back then. But now im really having trouble, i think, setting it up correctly. My Problem:
I really want to use bitmessage and try to figure this out! Not quite sure if i will receive messages now but i have downloaded bitmessage a few months ago and when i reinstalled it yesterday my old address was still in the client and i only have a "yellow" connection on my macbook with the port set to: 8444
if you want you can try send me a message:
also i have this address created yesterday on the bitmessage.ch website with @bitmessage.ch after the adress and im still not quite sure what to do with it since i can't really import it:
would be nice if you could help me out! im very willing to tip some bitcoin also :)
submitted by unnamed876456 to bitmessage [link] [comments]

DuckieTV v0.95 dev update progress

Hi all, just wanted to give a little development update:
We've finalized most of the development on the new user interface. Some touch-up's are still left todo but everything is taking shape nicely. This is absolutely becoming the prettiest DuckieTV ever!
Almost 300 commits already since the last v0.94 release (we've crossed the 2000 commit treshold on the repository :o ), and some cool new features are awaiting :)
You can try out a very recent dev version online here: http://duckietv.github.io/DuckieTV/ (beware: this uses an heroku proxy to overcome cross-domain restrictions! it can die any second)
Screenshots:
http://i.imgur.com/wsLxtEM.jpg http://i.imgur.com/kukLkut.jpg http://i.imgur.com/7uaNXbJ.jpg http://i.imgur.com/yAMt3NH.jpg http://i.imgur.com/N6ozIlM.jpg
submitted by schizoduckie to duckietv [link] [comments]

closed source torrent software doing sneaky things

See Also: http://www.reddit.com/technology/comments/2y4x3w/utorrent_silently_installing_bundled_bitcoin/ http://www.reddit.com/explainlikeimfive/comments/2y5czf/eli5_what_is_an_automatic_cryptocoin_miner_and/ http://www.reddit.com/tech/comments/2y53qe/utorrent_client_installs_bitcoin_miner_silently/
http://torrentfreak.com/utorrent-quietly-installs-riskware-bitcoin-miner-users-report-150306/
From RandomDude (see comment ):
2 days ago I was able to reproduce the issue, but now I am not. Here's a possible explanation: - when you open uTorrent installer it does an HTTP call to update.utorrent.com that looks like this: GET /installoffer.php?h=random&v=random &w=random&l=en&c=US&w64=1&db=chrome.exe%22&cl=uTorrent&tsub=1&svp=4 HTTP/1.1 (i've replaced some stuff that looked random with "random" since it could be personally identifiable data) - the HTTP GET call responds with something like: 379 d16:secondary_offersl2:oce2:oci1e3:adki1e16:content_offer_id10:FiveKnives17:content_offer_img26:FiveKnives_InstallPath.bmp17:content_offer_url113: http://apps.bittorrent.com/featuredcontent/featuredcontent.btapp?offer=http://bundles.bittorrent.com/inclient/yes21:content_offer_alttext34:Five Knives Bundle Download Now22:content_offer_checkbox41:Yes, I'd love to check out this download!21:content_offer_checkedi1e22:content_offer_autoexeci0e19:content_offer_title32:Check out our new Bundle Release22:content_offer_subtitle34:Special Offer for BitTorrent Users20:content_offer_footer248:By clicking "Next" and installing this torrent bundle, you agree to the BitTorrent, Inc. Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.13:toolbar_counti0e4:ctid0:2:tsi1425688963e1:c2:roe As you can see, the response contains information about what to display to the user, and also it encodes the information for the UI that will be displayed to the user. Now let's think about the following scenario: - one of uTorrent's server is not sending a proper UI encoding to the user. The UI validation function fails, but the first part of the payload is valid and the installer knows what to install, but it can't figure how to display the UI. The installer could in theory not display the UI and go ahead with the setup. I'm not saying that this is the case, but looking at the traffic exchange between my computer and uTorrent's servers it may be possible. The situation is not reproducible because: - uTorrent changed EpicScale with FiveKnives in my case - the second part of the message looks allright. If I were in charge at uTorrent I would look for malfunctioning servers and recent backend deploys. 
submitted by muyuu to opensource [link] [comments]

qBittorrent torrents becoming "stalled" despite tons of available seeders

I'm only downloading a single torrent at the moment, and it's at almost 89%. But I've just started noticing that every few minutes (sometimes as often as every 30 seconds) the status of the torrent switches to "stalled" and the download stops. While the torrent is downloading I'm getting good speeds, but then suddenly the speed will dip really low and then the torrent will stop downloading entirely and show as "stalled." The problem corrects itself on it's own after a few seconds or in some cases minutes, but comes back again soon after.
I can't seem to figure out what's causing this. I only recently switched to qBittorrent from uTorrent after the bitcoin mining thing became the final straw for me, so I might not be entirely familiar with this new program. I've unchecked all the options for connection limits in the settings but it had no effect. I also tried pausing the download and restarting the client, also to no effect.
If this has been happening the entire time I've been downloading then this torrent should've been finished many hours ago, because this is artificially extending the time it's taking for me to complete this download by quite a lot from what I've seen so far. If I can't figure out how to fix this I'm probably going to need to find a different client, which is a shame because I was just starting to like this one.
submitted by Ric_Adbur to torrents [link] [comments]

so i heard that utorrent is shit

so i heard about utorrent using pc's for bitcoin mining and i need a new torrent software what one do you guys prefer
submitted by Average_billy1976 to pcmasterrace [link] [comments]

(({{{Bitcoin$Free}})) Best. Cryptocurrency. Trading. Platform.

[+#Bitcoin$Free}}))Best Cryptocurrency Trading Platform THE BITCOIN MANIA Trading on crypto currencies, is the new trend taking over of the digital money market. Bitcoin, the crypto currency is breaking records with 4,500% growth in the last year, proving that the future is in crypto currencies. BITCOIN TRAINING DAY Join our risk free "Bitcoin Club Marathon", where you will get a demo account to perfect your trading skills. Here you receive an opportunity to learn from others without risking your money. Crypto Signals Crypto currencies exchange market could be highly fluctuant, presenting numerous opportunities 24/7. The club provides you Signals system that will send you alerts whenever an opportunity arises.
bitcoin,.,price,.,bitcoin,.,mining,.,bitcoin,.,to gbp,.,bitcoin,.,news,.,bitcoin,.,wallet,.,bitcoin,.,to usd,.,bitcoin,.,price chart,.,bitcoin,.,exchange rate,.,bitcoin,.,cash,.,bitcoin,.,price history,.,bitcoin,.,bitcoin,.,atm,.,bitcoin,.,account,.,bitcoin,.,atm london,.,bitcoin,.,alternative,.,bitcoin,.,address,.,bitcoin,.,atm near me,.,bitcoin,.,august 1st,.,bitcoin,.,atm uk,.,bitcoin,.,asic,.,bitcoin,.,app,.,a,.,bitcoin,.,to naira,.,a,.,bitcoin,.,miner,.,a,.,bitcoin,.,address,.,a,.,bitcoin,.,worth,.,a,.,bitcoin,.,governance network,.,a,.,bitcoin,.,atm,.,a,.,bitcoin,.,faucet,.,a,.,bitcoin,.,transaction,.,a,.,bitcoin,.,wallet,.,a,.,bitcoin,.,to a dollar,.,bitcoin,.,buy,.,bitcoin,.,blockchain,.,bitcoin,.,bubble,.,bitcoin,.,buy uk,.,bitcoin,.,broker,.,bitcoin,.,block explorer,.,bitcoin,.,billionaire,.,bitcoin,.,bank,.,bitcoin,.,blockchain size,.,bitcoin,.,bbc,.,bitcoin,.,b font,.,bitcoin,.,miner.b,.,bitcoin,.,b symbol,.,mel b,.,bitcoin,.,buy,.,bitcoin,.,capital b,.,bitcoin,.,b-eleven,.,bitcoin,.,plan b,.,bitcoin,.,b-wallet,.,bitcoin,.,b&h,.,bitcoin,.,bitcoin,.,chart,.,bitcoin,.,converter,.,bitcoin,.,core,.,bitcoin,.,crash,.,bitcoin,.,currency,.,bitcoin,.,current value,.,bitcoin,.,calculator uk,.,bitcoin,.,creator,.,bitcoin,.,casino,.,c,.,bitcoin,.,miner,.,c,.,bitcoin,.,library,.,c't,.,bitcoin,.,c,.,bitcoin,.,wallet,.,bitcoin,.,ac id,.,bitcoin,.,c sharp,.,bitcoin,.,miner-c pup,.,bitcointalk c-cex,.,bitcoin,.,c==,.,bitcoin,.,debit card,.,bitcoin,.,difficulty,.,bitcoin,.,dollar,.,bitcoin,.,debit card uk,.,bitcoin,.,dark,.,bitcoin,.,documentary,.,bitcoin,.,drop,.,bitcoin,.,define,.,bitcoin,.,dark web,.,bitcoin,.,download,.,bitcoin.d,.,bitcoin,.,xt d,.,bitcoind backup,.,d-wave,.,bitcoin,.,mining,.,the d,.,bitcoin,.,atm,.,d'angelo,.,bitcoin,.,system d,.,bitcoin,.,init.d,.,bitcoind,.,d las vegas,.,bitcoin,.,/etc/init.d/bitcoind,.,bitcoin,.,exchange,.,bitcoin,.,explained,.,bitcoin,.,etf,.,bitcoin,.,exchange uk,.,bitcoin,.,ethereum,.,bitcoin,.,explorer,.,bitcoin,.,exchange rate uk,.,bitcoin,.,euro,.,bitcoin,.,exchange rate chart,.,bitcoin,.,exchange rate history,.,bitcoin,.,e wallet,.,,.,bitcoin,.,e.g. crossword,.,bitcoin,.,e.g. crossword clue,.,bitcoin,.,e commerce,.,bitcoin,.,e-currency,.,bitcoin,.,e money,.,bitcoin,.,e card,.,bitcoin,.,ebook,.,bitcoin,.,e-voucher,.,bitcoin,.,e pill,.,bitcoin,.,fork,.,bitcoin,.,forecast,.,bitcoin,.,faucet,.,bitcoin,.,forum,.,bitcoin,.,for dummies,.,bitcoin,.,farm,.,bitcoin,.,fees,.,bitcoin,.,founder,.,bitcoin,.,future,.,bitcoin,.,fund,.,f#,.,bitcoin,.,price of,.,bitcoin,.,brother john f,.,bitcoin,.,bh f,.,bitcoin,.,msil,.,bitcoin,.,miner-f,.,bitcoin,.,gbp,.,bitcoin,.,graph,.,bitcoin,.,growth,.,bitcoin,.,generator,.,bitcoin,.,gambling,.,bitcoin,.,github,.,bitcoin,.,games,.,bitcoin,.,guide,.,bitcoin,.,google finance,.,bitcoin,.,global capital,.,g,.,bitcoin,.,price,.,g,.,bitcoin,.,charts,.,g,.,bitcoin,.,value,.,g,.,bitcoin,.,mining calculator,.,bitcoin,.,guiminer,.,ghash,.,bitcoin,.,g coin,.,bitcointalk,.,g cash to,.,bitcoin,.,bitcoin,.,miner.g,.,bitcoin,.,hard fork,.,bitcoin,.,hardware wallet,.,bitcoin,.,history,.,bitcoin,.,historical price,.,bitcoin,.,hack,.,bitcoin,.,how to buy,.,bitcoin,.,halving,.,bitcoin,.,how it works,.,bitcoin,.,hashrate,.,bitcoin,.,hardware wallet uk,.,bitcoin,.,h/s,.,c&h,.,bitcoin,.,main.h,.,bitcoin,.,hash.h,.,bitcoin,.,coins.h,.,bitcoin,.,best b#$h -,.,bitcoin,.,best b#$h -,.,bitcoin,.,lyrics,.,h&r block,.,bitcoin,.,h-not-zero,.,bitcoin,.,bitcoin,.,investment,.,bitcoin,.,in gbp,.,bitcoin,.,investment trust,.,bitcoin,.,index,.,bitcoin,.,inventor,.,bitcoin,.,in usd,.,bitcoin,.,india,.,bitcoin,.,inflation,.,bitcoin,.,in dollars,.,bitcoin,.,investment uk,.,i,.,bitcoin,.,in usd,.,i,.,bitcoin,.,in inr,.,i,.,bitcoin,.,to pkr,.,i,.,bitcoin,.,to dollar,.,i,.,bitcoin,.,to naira,.,i,.,bitcoin,.,in rs,.,i,.,bitcoin,.,= satoshi,.,i,.,bitcoin,.,is equal to,.,i,.,bitcoin,.,berapa rupiah,.,i,.,bitcoin,.,in inr in 2009,.,bitcoin,.,japan,.,bitcoin,.,jobs,.,bitcoin,.,japan legal,.,bitcoin,.,jesus,.,bitcoin,.,jobs london,.,bitcoin,.,jobs uk,.,bitcoin,.,july 2017,.,bitcoin,.,jokes,.,bitcoin,.,june 2017,.,bitcoin,.,jihan,.,bitcoin,.,j,.,bitcoinj tutorial,.,bitcoinj micropayments,.,mary j,.,bitcoin,.,belle,.,mary j,.,bitcointalk,.,j maurice,.,bitcoin,.,mary j,.,bitcoin,.,j p morgan,.,bitcoin,.,,.,bitcoin,.,j vty,.,обменник,.,bitcoin,.,bitcoin,.,kurs,.,bitcoin,.,kraken,.,bitcoin,.,koers,.,bitcoin,.,knots,.,bitcoin,.,key,.,bitcoin,.,kopen,.,bitcoin,.,korea,.,bitcoin,.,knowledge,.,bitcoin,.,kaufen,.,bitcoin,.,kurz,.,bitcoin,.,k line,.,bitcoin,.,k,.,bitcoin,.,k value,.,bitcoin,.,k chart,.,john k,.,bitcoin,.,bitcoin,.,k-market,.,k-market jätkäsaari,.,bitcoin,.,k čemu,.,bitcoin,.,bitcoin,.,live price,.,bitcoin,.,latest news,.,bitcoin,.,login,.,bitcoin,.,logo,.,bitcoin,.,ledger,.,bitcoin,.,live,.,bitcoin,.,local,.,bitcoin,.,lottery,.,bitcoin,.,london,.,bitcoin,.,loan,.,bitcoin,.,l-39,.,l-39,.,bitcoin,.,jet,.,bitcoin,.,l'altra faccia della moneta,.,l'ambassade,.,bitcoin,.,l'avenir du,.,bitcoin,.,l'histoire du,.,bitcoin,.,l'inventeur du,.,bitcoin,.,l'évolution du,.,bitcoin,.,l'avenir des,.,bitcoins,.,l'origine du,.,bitcoin,.,bitcoin,.,market,.,bitcoin,.,millionaire,.,bitcoin,.,mining software,.,bitcoin,.,meaning,.,bitcoin,.,mining hardware,.,bitcoin,.,machine,.,bitcoin,.,mining pool,.,bitcoin,.,magazine,.,bitcoin,.,mining rig,.,m,.,bitcoin,.,meaning,.,m.bitcoin2048,.,bitcoin,.,m of n,.,bitcoin,.,m of n transactions,.,siriusxm,.,bitcoin,.,triple m,.,bitcoin,.,m lhuillier,.,bitcoin,.,m pesa vs,.,bitcoin,.,m.bitcoin2048.com отзывы,.,mercado,.,bitcoin,.,bitcoin,.,news uk,.,bitcoin,.,network,.,bitcoin,.,net worth,.,bitcoin,.,news reddit,.,bitcoin,.,nodes,.,bitcoin,.,network fee,.,bitcoin,.,near me,.,bitcoin,.,nedir,.,bitcoin,.,news india,.,bitcoin.n,.,bitcoin,.,n.ireland,.,n&p,.,bitcoin,.,consulting,.,shares in,.,bitcoin,.,piotr_n,.,bitcointalk,.,piotr_n,.,bitcoin,.,m of n,.,bitcoin,.,bitcoinspot.n,.,bitcoin,.,or ethereum,.,bitcoin,.,owner,.,bitcoin,.,online,.,bitcoin,.,original price,.,bitcoin,.,offline wallet,.,bitcoin,.,online wallet,.,bitcoin,.,outlook,.,bitcoin,.,official site,.,bitcoin,.,on amazon,.,o,.,bitcoin,.,e seguro,.,o,.,bitcoinu,.,bitcoin,.,o'reilly,.,bitcoin,.,to aud,.,bitcoin,.,o'reilly pdf,.,bitcoin,.,to euro,.,bitcoin,.,to btc,.,sve o,.,bitcoin,.,o'reilly,.,bitcoin,.,and the blockchain,.,bitcoin,.,price gbp,.,bitcoin,.,predictions,.,bitcoin,.,price uk,.,bitcoin,.,price prediction,.,bitcoin,.,paper wallet,.,bitcoin,.,pizza,.,,.,bitcoin,.,price live,.,p np,.,bitcoin,.,r.i.p.,.,bitcoin,.,p-free,.,bitcoin,.,win32/bitcoinminer.p,.,bitcoin,.,qt,.,bitcoin,.,qr code,.,bitcoin,.,quote,.,bitcoin,.,quantum computing,.,bitcoin,.,que es,.,bitcoin,.,quora,.,bitcoin,.,questions,.,bitcoin,.,qt update,.,bitcoin,.,qt wallet location,.,bitcoin,.,quantum,.,bitcoin,.,q,.,bitcoin,.,q es,.,q son,.,bitcoins,.,q es un,.,bitcoin,.,q son los,.,bitcoins,.,q es el,.,bitcoin,.,q comprar con,.,bitcoins,.,bitcoins que significa,.,bitcoin,.,q significa,.,bitcoin,.,rate,.,bitcoin,.,reddit,.,bitcoin,.,review,.,bitcoin,.,rival,.,bitcoin,.,rate gbp,.,bitcoin,.,rise,.,bitcoin,.,regulation,.,bitcoin,.,rich list,.,bitcoin,.,rate history,.,bitcoin,.,regulation uk,.,r,.,bitcoinmarkets,.,r,.,bitcoin,.,uk,.,r,.,bitcoin,.,canada,.,r,.,bitcoin,.,cash,.,r,.,bitcoin,.,package,.,r,.,bitcointalk,.,r,.,bitcoin,.,mining,.,r,.,bitcoin,.,abc,.,r,.,bitcoin,.,analysis,.,bitcoinxt,.,bitcoin,.,share price,.,bitcoin,.,stock,.,bitcoin,.,split,.,bitcoin,.,segwit,.,bitcoin,.,stock price,.,bitcoin,.,shares,.,bitcoin,.,symbol,.,bitcoin,.,suisse,.,bitcoin,.,scams,.,bitcoin,.,stock market,.,bitcoins value,.,bitcoin,.,s curve,.,bitcoin,.,miners,.,gh/s,.,bitcoin,.,th/s,.,bitcoin,.,th/s,.,bitcoin,.,miner,.,mh/s,.,bitcoin,.,1th/s,.,bitcoin,.,miner,.,10th/s,.,bitcoin,.,miner,.,20th/s,.,bitcoin,.,miner,.,bitcoin,.,trading,.,bitcoin,.,to dollar,.,bitcoin,.,transaction,.,bitcoin,.,to £,.,bitcoin,.,ticker,.,bitcointalk,.,bitcoin,.,transaction fee,.,bitcoin,.,t shirt,.,bitcoin,.,t shirt uk,.,bitcoin,.,t shirt india,.,bitcoin,.,t shirt store,.,alpha-t,.,bitcointalk,.,bb&t,.,bitcoin,.,t-110,.,bitcoin,.,mining system,.,bitcoin,.,miner t720,.,bitcoin,.,usd,.,bitcoin,.,uk,.,bitcoin,.,unlimited,.,bitcoin,.,unconfirmed transaction,.,bitcoin,.,usd price,.,bitcoin,.,uk price,.,bitcoin,.,uasf,.,bitcoin,.,uk tax,.,bitcoin,.,update,.,bitcoin,.,uk exchange,.,why u,.,bitcoin,.,billionaire,.,bitcoin,.,u bosni,.,bitcoin,.,miner.u,.,bitcoin,.,u crnoj gori,.,bitcoin,.,youtube,.,bitcoin,.,u dinarima,.,wii u,.,bitcoin,.,utorrent,.,bitcoin,.,u.s.,.,bitcoin,.,exchange,.,bitcoin,.,u kune,.,bitcoin,.,value,.,,.,bitcoin,.,value chart,.,bitcoin,.,value history,.,bitcoin,.,value gbp,.,bitcoin,.,vs ethereum,.,bitcoin,.,vs usd,.,bitcoin,.,volatility,.,bitcoin,.,vs litecoin,.,bitcoin,.,value 2010,.,bitcoin,.,vs gold,.,bitcoin,.,v litecoin,.,bitcoin,.,v dollar,.,bitcoin,.,v euro,.,bitcoin,.,v gold,.,bitcoin,.,v blockchain,.,bitcoin,.,v onecoin,.,bitcoin,.,hack v.2,.,bitcoin,.,worth,.,bitcoin,.,wiki,.,bitcoin,.,wallet uk,.,bitcoin,.,what is it,.,bitcoinwisdom,.,bitcoin,.,whitepaper,.,bitcoin,.,wallet online,.,bitcoin,.,wallet address,.,bitcoin,.,wallet download,.,bitcoin,.,miner.w,.,bitcoin,.,w polsce,.,bitcoiny w polsce,.,bitcoin,.,w niemczech,.,bitcoin,.,w chmurze,.,bitcoin,.,w żabce,.,bitcoin,.,w polsce legalny,.,bitcoin,.,w chinach,.,bitcoin,.,w prawie polskim,.,bitcoin,.,w górę,.,bitcoin,.,xe,.,bitcoin,.,xbt,.,bitcoin,.,xt,.,bitcoin,.,xbte,.,bitcoin,.,xapo,.,bitcoin,.,xrp,.,bitcoin,.,xt price,.,bitcoin,.,xpub,.,x,.,bitcoin,.,generator,.,bitcoin,.,yahoo finance,.,bitcoin,.,year chart,.,bitcoin,.,year,.,bitcoin,.,yield,.,bitcoin,.,ytd,.,bitcoin,.,yubikey,.,bitcoin,.,yoda,.,bitcoin,.,yahoo finance chart,.,ybitcoin,.,magazine,.,bitcoin,.,y control de cambio,.,y combinator,.,bitcoin,.,ecuador y,.,bitcoin,.,bitcoin,.,by paypal,.,bitcoin,.,y el lavado de dinero,.,bitcoin,.,y deep web,.,bitcoin,.,y lavado de dinero,.,bitcoin,.,y litecoin,.,bitcoin,.,and blockchain,.,bitcoin,.,zebra,.,bitcoin,.,zerohedge,.,bitcoin,.,zimbabwe,.,bitcoin,.,zar,.,bitcoin,.,zcash,.,bitcoin,.,zapwallettxes,.,bitcoin,.,zarabianie,.,bitcoin,.,zug,.,bitcoin,.,zero,.,bitcoin,.,zero confirmations,.,bitcoin,.,z value,.,titan z,.,bitcoin,.,mining,.,titan z,.,bitcoin,.,z cash,.,bitcoin,.,nvidia titan z,.,bitcoin,.,mining,.,nvidia titan z,.,bitcoin,.,nakup zlata z,.,bitcoini,.,sklep z,.,bitcoinami,.,trgovanje z,.,bitcoini,.,co z,.,bitcoinem,.,bitcoin,.,0 confirmations,.,bitcoin,.,0.1,.,bitcoin,.,0.1.0,.,bitcoin,.,0 active connections,.,bitcoin,.,0 transaction fee,.,bitcoin,.,0 fee,.,0.15,.,bitcoins,.,0 25,.,bitcoins,.,0.05,.,bitcoin,.,in euro,.,bitcoin,.,2.0,.,0.1,.,bitcoins,.,0.21,.,bitcoins,.,bitcoin,.,1st august,.,bitcoin,.,1 million,.,bitcoin,.,101,.,bitcoin,.,10 year chart,.,bitcoin,.,10000,.,bitcoin,.,148,.,,.,bitcoin,.,10 year prediction,.,bitcoin,.,100k,.,bitcoin,.,100 dollars,.,bitcoin,.,10 years ago,.,1,.,bitcoin,.,in gbp,.,1,.,bitcoin,.,in pounds,.,1,.,bitcoin,.,in £,.,1,.,bitcoin,.,to dollar,.,1,.,bitcoin,.,in inr,.,1,.,bitcoin,.,to euro,.,1,.,bitcoin,.,in gdp,.,1,.,bitcoin,.,in eur,.,1,.,bitcoin,.,to myr,.,1,.,bitcoin,.,in sterling,.,bitcoin,.,2010,.,bitcoin,.,2017,.,bitcoin,.,2020,.,bitcoin,.,2018,.,bitcoin,.,2009,.,bitcoin,.,2013,.,bitcoin,.,21 million,.,bitcoin,.,2012,.,bitcoin,.,2014,.,2,.,bitcoin,.,to usd,.,2,.,bitcoin,.,price,.,2,.,bitcoin,.,to inr,.,2,.,bitcoin,.,wallets,.,2,.,bitcoins to dollars,.,2,.,bitcoins free,.,2,.,bitcoins a month,.,2,.,bitcoin,.,qt,.,bitcoin,.,2 year chart,.,bitcoin,.,2 paypal,.,bitcoin,.,3000,.,bitcoin,.,31st july,.,bitcoin,.,3 confirmations,.,bitcoin,.,3.0,.,bitcoin,.,3 year chart,.,bitcoin,.,3 month chart,.,bitcoin,.,300,.,bitcoin,.,365 club,.,bitcoin,.,3000 usd,.,bitcoin,.,30 confirmations,.,3,.,bitcoins in gbp,.,3,.,bitcoins,.,3,.,bitcoins to usd,.,3,.,bitcoin,.,in euro,.,3,.,bitcoin,.,to eur,.,bitcoin,.,3 unlimited,.,bitcoin,.,3 day chart,.,bitcoin,.,3 address,.,bitcoin,.,4000,.,bitcoin,.,4chan,.,bitcoin,.,4 billion,.,bitcoin,.,401k,.,bitcoin,.,4 backpage,.,bitcoin,.,43,.,bitcoin,.,40000,.,bitcoin,.,4k,.,bitcoin,.,4 year chart,.,bitcoin,.,48,.,4,.,bitcoins,.,4,.,bitcoins to usd,.,4,.,bitcoins in gbp,.,4,.,bitcoin,.,to eur,.,bitcoins 4 backpage,.,bitcoin,.,4 igaming,.,bitcoin,.,4 u,.,bitcoin,.,4 november,.,bitcoin,.,4 cash,.,bitcoin,.,5 year chart,.,bitcoin,.,51 attack,.,bitcoin,.,500,.,bitcoin,.,5 year,.,bitcoin,.,500 000,.,bitcoin,.,5000,.,bitcoin,.,50000,.,bitcoin,.,5 year price,.,bitcoin,.,5 years ago,.,bitcoin,.,5 year forecast,.,5,.,bitcoins in pounds,.,5,.,bitcoins,.,5,.,bitcoins to usd,.,5,.,bitcoin,.,free,.,5,.,bitcoin,.,in euro,.,bitcoin,.,5 years,.,bitcoin,.,5 minutes,.,bitcoin,.,5 min,.,bitcoin,.,5 unlimited generator,.,bitcoin,.,666,.,bitcoin,.,6 months,.,bitcoin,.,6 confirmations,.,bitcoin,.,6 month chart,.,bitcoin,.,6000,.,bitcoin,.,60 minutes,.,bitcoin,.,6 confirmations time,.,bitcoin,.,6 month price,.,bitcoin,.,6 years ago,.,bitcoin,.,60 day chart,.,6,.,bitcoin,.,network confirmations,.,,.,
submitted by besterse to BestCryptoPlatform [link] [comments]

Viruses in popcorn-time ?

Hey there,
Is there some malwares in installation of poppcorn time ? Because for example Utorrent put a bitcoin miner malware in the native software, which slows the pc.
I know popcorn time is opensource. But is it the case for the whole code ? Or is there some secret parts ?
I have a new laptop and don't want to be infected, by a rootkit in the worst case.
thank you :)
submitted by JackPoteJazz to PopCornTime [link] [comments]

Best Bitcoin Miner Machine Free download ️ Best BTC Miners ... Top 5 Best Torrent Sites in 2020 - YouTube [BEWARE] Torrent Websites Installing Bitcoin Mining Malware YouTube FREE BITCOINS🔥Simple & Free BTC Mining software! Fresh ...

New version of uTorrent bundled with secret bitcoin mining software? Written by Matti Vähäkainu @ 07 Mar 2015 8:05 User comments (16) The users of the uTorrent have found that the new version of the popular BitTorrent client comes with an additional piece of software unseen before. µTorrent® (uTorrent) Web torrent client for Windows -- uTorrent is a browser based torrent client. uTorrent's latest update may be hijacking computers to turn a profit. According to a report from Trusted Reviews, the latest update to the popular torrent management software comes bundled with a... Presently, uTorrent is the most popular torrent client. BitTorrent is also one of the most widely used torrenting applications. So, you simply need to get one of the torrent applications, such as uTorrent, use the torrent file with it and download the file you want to. So, what role do these best torrent sites play? BitTorrent Inc. released a new version the popular BitTorrent client uTorrent this week. The release aims to make it easier for users to avoid a highly criticized Bitcoin miner which was bundled ...

[index] [50637] [48414] [6934] [34766] [32781] [39501] [9486] [470] [19817] [41779]

Best Bitcoin Miner Machine Free download ️ Best BTC Miners ...

FREE DOWNLOAD: https://bit.ly/2IBIdyO Let your computer make you money with Bitcoin Miner, the free easy-to-use Bitcoin miner! Earn Bitcoin which can be exc... In this video I talk about how popular torrent / pirate websites are installing Cryptocurrency Mining Malware on your computer without your knowledge. Some things that you need to know: Some ... Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube. ️ Download for free from http://bitsoftmachine.com/?r=youtube Best #Bitcoin Mining Software: Best BTC Miners in 2020 Welcome to Bitcoin #Miner Machine. Bitc... 5 Best Torrent Sites in 2020, Don't forget to subscribe

#